Showing posts with label Catholicism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Catholicism. Show all posts

Monday, April 27, 2015

K. 42/35a, Grabmusik

Early apologies. For as refined as I may have pretended to be, I am still a troglodyte clinging to an ancient hope. I am not enlightened enough to adhere to the solely material. And, I ain't no hippy out to say every belief is equally valid. I get some may not like that. Sure, I'm out to explore Mozart's music, not preach. But, I'm tackling a religious work, so I will not be able to intellectually and honestly avoid a religious talk. Yet, for the sensibilities of those who may not care to hear the barbaric, I will comment on the music first.

Mozart grew up Catholic. It permeated his familial life. Leopold made major family decisions to ensure they lived in a Catholic region. (They could have had some good prospects had they taken employment in London. It worked for Handel and Haydn. But, alas...) So, of course, a young Mozart would have had composed music for mass. And, we come to another of many. 

K. 42, Grabmusik is his longest mass work at this place in the Köchel, I think. (Unless you count K. 35.) This work is a Passion. Or, it focuses on the suffering Christ went through when he bore the cross. Heavy themes to find the right music. I'm not sure young Mozart carried the emotional-evoking burden well. It is a work of four movements. The first is the most emotionally tone-deaf. (Ha. Ha. Look I'm calling Mozart tone-deaf.) I'm not saying, the music is no good. In fact, it is very nice. It has the same sound of many of his later operas. But, for a song speaking of the soul crushing guilt that Christ had to bear such torture for our sins, it is too jovial. The first movement is redeemed, however, around the 3.5 minute mark. This is actually the best bit of brooding, dark music that reflects real anguish from guilt. Unfortunately, it returns back to a rumpus frolic, with laughing included. 

The second movement holds sorrow. And yes, what fitting emotion to carry when singing of remembering Christ's death. But, the lyrics seem to call for more rumble. I mean... Boulders split... Sun, moon and stars take flight... Thunder! Flames and Lightning...? The third does well enough to reflect guilty sorrow. Sorrow that leads to repentance. And the last bit declares victory. Victory in the death of Christ. "Feed us with thy broken body, now in death's agony."

And, this is the faith that pressed itself upon Mozart. It stayed with him. He would have unlikely ever given it up. Mozart saw his faith as his identity. (Even though, this religion was not what he believed. When I dabble in his Freemason ventures, I'll elaborate more.) He grew up seeing Christ as the suffering servant--which he was. But, this suffering focused unduly on the physical. The triumphant stamp was Christ's death. His physical death. As a protestant, I stress the stamp of victory was his resurrection. There are plenty of Catholics who would say this is a valid point, but even then there is a theology (prevalent for Mozart) that emphasizes an idea of the physical suffering. 

Thus the physical, the material, dominated the Mozarts' fears. And, Mozart's fears, even those fears we might believe were spiritual. 

But I must say, Christ's physical torture was not the pinnacle of the Passion.

The night He was betrayed, Christ wept, trembling with fear for what was about to take place. To the point of sweating blood. I can hardly imagine not having the same fear. Yet, later, when many of the disciples were martyred, history speaks of the peace they had. Stephen celebrated he was going home. Peter picked a more gruesome death.  What? Did they have more courage than Christ? Some may say, 'They had the Holy Spirit.' But, in one sense, isn't Christ the living embodiment of the Holy Spirit. Equal in nature and in strength?

So, am I calling Christ a coward? Be no means! The physical suffering was nothing compared to what he was going to take upon himself. The wrath of God. (A hint of this comes from a sermon I heard. And I do not know all his references, so I apologies for lack of citation) Every forgiven sin, ever committed, Jesus absorbed that wrath. And, even though some believe they have bore guilt and fear, no one can truly know what that kind of wrath is like, but God alone. Christ, God in the flesh, knew what was coming. He fully and completely understood.

We can never know what it was like for Christ. In fact, we have an aversion to the idea that God would take our sins that seriously. In my own sinful flesh, I have a hard time accepting it. So, I'm sure someone who has gotten this far is gnashing his or her teeth because of how 'barbaric' I sound. I'm not trying to offend. But... Everyone can agree that there are, and have been, horrible individuals that were flippantly callous about their actions. Do you think Hitler felt sorry about what he had done? And, in the small odds that he had, would the hint of guilt he could conjure ever be enough?

I know. I know. This is difficult stuff to wrestle with. But, our physical fears are the only fears we can somewhat understand. Thus, they dominate our lives. As with Mozart. And, even the times we wrestle with the spiritual, how do we determine legitimate fears when we have primarily physical experiences? 

Ultimately, there are two types of people: Those who do not fear the wrath of God. And, those who do not need to fear the wrath of God. The former do not believe their actions render such consequences. (They may be right.) And, those who do not need to fear the wrath of God. This could be because He doesn't exist. OR... Or, because one has let Christ bear the punishment for the sins we have committed. Let Christ bear a wrath we cannot fully comprehend. And, let Christ bear a wrath we will never have to.

A troglodyte, as I, strives not to let either physical or spiritual fears dominate my life. I do what I can to cling to a confidence in Christ and his actions. Yet, like just as Mozart's music sings, I fail...








Thursday, May 2, 2013

K. 15, Sonata in B-Flat


K. 15, Sonata in B-Flat

A two-movement work, of a new set of tempos.  Andante Meastoso and Allegro Grazioso.  The terms are Greek to me (not actually, I have taken four semesters of Greek).  The first is ions more moving than the second.  The violin (or flute—I listened top both versions.) anticipates a hopeful future and sighs in content, all mixed with hints of trepidation.  The second movement is frolicking ditty.

K. 10-15 were all published in England.  I couldn’t help but wonder… (Trying to be as least offensive as possible.)  What if Leopold would have stayed in England?  England received the Mozarts well.  And, Leopold felt they were appreciated there.  Great composers flocked to England, including JC Bach.  In spite of musical growth fodder, Leopold could not confine himself to an area that wasn’t Catholic.  Now, I know the importance of standing up for one’s beliefs. But, I can’t help notice the oodles of people who doggedly stick to something they don’t believe in.  Too often people tie their identities into worldviews that don’t agree with.  For example one time I heard a commentator state a certain candidate couldn’t help his religion because he was ‘born that way.’   This mentality illustrates why so many cling to a religion even if they do no believe it.  Religion to many is not a choice, but part of who they are.  I disagree with that notion. 

I was talking with a friend, who was getting married in the Catholic Church.  He complained about what the priest was saying.  I asked him why he had to get married in the Catholic Church.  He said because he was Catholic.  I asked him if he believe such-and-such and what-and-not.  He said no to every point.  I didn’t want to say it, but the truth is he was not Catholic.   How many others cling to a religion they don’t believe (or for that matter a non-religion)? I’m not out to bash Catholics or the religious.  If fact, I’m of a strong reformed Baptist theology.  I am simply saying if you were to ask me about the points that define such a theology, I actually believe them.  And, I strive to stand by them.  

So how does this apply to Mozart?  Leopold insisted on being in a Catholic area because he was Catholic.  But, something about his understanding of his faith goads me.  A man of faith so tightly clinging to the material.  His letters are riddled with complaints of financial woes.  However, historians have suggested, Leopold likely had sufficient income.  I’m not saying he didn’t believe in Catholicism, simply that he didn’t fully understand it.  And not understanding one’s faith is not problematic (no one really does), but an unwillingness to dig deeper is. 

And, maybe I’m a prejudice stick-in-the-mud, who sides with a Protestant theology, and thinks it would have been a no-brainer for Mozart to stay in England. Just… Who knows what would have been different if they had stayed in England?  With the revolutionary war soon to come, maybe they were better off.